<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
   <title>Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip Fodder: Comments
from "Studio 60: The Long Lead Story"</title>
   <link>http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml</link>
   <description>Comments for the entry "Studio 60: The Long Lead Story"</description>
   <language>en-us</language>
   <generator>Movable Type v4.21-en</generator>
   <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>






   <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:25:16
-05:00</lastBuildDate>






    <item>


     <title>Comment from xedout</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>The reality shows allow the networks to make enough profit to do the 'quality' stuff. I don't think Jordan was in any real position to turn down that hideous reality show. Unless there is some mention of it tanking on the other network.</p>

<p>Saw the ep on Sunday night. :)</p>

<p>Didn't really see the point of the long interview with 'Harriet' or the amount of exposition for her character. </p>

<p>Interesting nod to McLuhan and the 'medium'.</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11667</guid>


     <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:25:16
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Matt</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Certainly the worst episode so far this season. I don't understand why Bradley Whitford has so little screentime.  They should really split the time better between him and Matthew Perry.  I found myself kind of bored half way through the episode.  Harriet is not that interesting a character, seems they have based the entire storyline about that her and Matt, but nobody really cares.  Still better than most of the crap on TV though.      </p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11697</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:30:59
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Sheridan</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>What are they thinking? There was so much "tell" and not "show" this episode. The Harriet backstory might have been interesting for something but not here. (In agreement with xedout and Matt above that it's still one of the best shows on the networks but it is slipping badly.) </p>

<p>The whole Jordan thing was great - would have loved to have seen more of that. (By the way - Amanda Peet is pregnant so maybe that's why she's looking better/glowier than usual) </p>

<p>Cool about the Groundling School (what kind of a school is it?) I was loving the Bennington stuff in the skit - I'm from there originally - I guess they had a little something for everyone. </p>

<p>I do think also that the dialogue, even in the skits, is a bit more intelligent than the real SNL was (especially when it started tanking) - if they want to keep the original fans of this show they'd better get back to where they were. Water cooler talk here is in agreement with xed and Matt) </p>

<p>Great recap! </p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11720</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:41:01
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Sheridan</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Hey xedout! I missed it again - when was there a McLuhan and medium message? <br />
Did you think it worked this time?</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11721</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:43:21
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from yep</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Totally disagree. Thought this was the second best episode of the four.</p>

<p>Loved the running gag of the Tom Jeter character in the lobster costume. His character is getting more lines and participation in the overall story, and I think he's doing well.</p>

<p>This was more or less a complete character background episode. It set up the article. It told you everything you wanted to know about HHH. It set up Danny's goal of remodeling the stuido and added some character development of his gravitas outside of Studio 60. It continued the thought that, on some level,Matt is coming unraveled trying to write the entire show and deal with Harriet.</p>

<p>Ed Asner was terrific.</p>

<p>The ending was perfect.</p>

<p>The skits (particularly Dr. Nic) weren't all that entertaining to me. I do like the fact that Rebeccca Needs a Baby wasn't as funny as maybe it could have been, especially the point that this was done on purpose to set up Matt and Danny's conversation immediately following it.</p>

<p>Understand, though that within the grand scheme of what is likely to be the rest of season one, this was a setup show. You need to have one or two of these in order for things to happen later.</p>

<p>And after all this, no writers room plot line advancement.</p>

<p>You will appreciate what this show setup later, I think.</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11725</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:32:20
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Charlee</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those episodes that needs to be there. It's not about what can you give me tonight. Look at HBO, great shows but some "fillers." The production is great - music, shots, visual photos to keep us in the show. Greatness. I was never a West Wing fan, but I love this stuff. <br />
He's smart in how he is building stories and not just handing us dribble that doesn't even need to be digested. </p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11731</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:50:45
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Sheridan</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm a big soap fan myself - so as a soap maybe I'd agree with yep and charlee - but anything above and a bit beyond a soap should be playing by the "show don't tell" rules. Especially someone with a background like Sorkin. </p>

<p>On a practical level - who knows how much longer the show will run? So they've got to grab the audience and hook us and reel us in HARD. Wasn't feeling it last night. Even the Ed Asner lines were so exposition-exposition-more exposition with a little product placement thrown in (although he did do a great job with what he had). </p>

<p>That last moment? Huh? That was a total WTF? moment. </p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11732</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:59:40
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Janie</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Good blog, you need to work on tightening up your writing, you could be a great reviewer.</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11762</guid>


     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:45:04
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>









    <item>


     <title>Comment from Diane</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>The show is getting better and catching its rhythm.  Sorkin's writing is feeling like he is becoming comfortable with his characters.  Last night's show had some moments where I wanted to appreciate the places TV could take us, and I don't find that too preachy.  I appreciate Sorkin's ability to make us hope - especially when it's funny.</p>

<p>I completely agree that focusing the episodes around Matt and Harriet is boring. Love seeing Matt and Danny working together.  I wonder if A Peet can pull off the role of a tough TV exec.  What about Lisa Edelstein for the role? </p>

<p>It's the harping on the Christian right that is tedious.  There are plenty of enemies - one being the fight again Lowest Common Denominator TV, Jerry Springer and the pervasive lack of imagination in the medium.  </p>

<p>My favorite moment is still in the quick collage of skits in episode 2 in Science Shmience when the line up of various religious fundamentalists are asked to explain the cause of Hurricane Katrina, the host responds with "No, I'm sorry.  The answer we were looking for . . . and darn if I didn't Tivo the thing to remind myself of the end of that joke. Truly clever.  </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml">Read the original post: Studio 60: The Long Lead Story</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/archives/2006/10/studio_60_the_long_lead_story.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/studio_60/#c11858</guid>


     <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:05:54
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>





 </channel>


</rss>