<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
   <title>Battlestar Fodder: Comments
from "Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;"</title>
   <link>http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml</link>
   <description>Comments for the entry "Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;"</description>
   <language>en-us</language>
   <generator>Movable Type v3.2</generator>
   <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>




   <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:20:18
-05:00</lastBuildDate>






    <item>


     <title>Comment from mac</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>My ... God.</p>

<p>What an episode: emotion, character development, major revelations and events and, to top it all off, a movie-worth battle sequence. </p>

<p>It was so good, I watched it live, then watched it a second time on my TiVo. I might even watch it again. If the "Battlestar" crew ever wanted to move the big screen, they could easily take this three episode arc (Pegasus, Resurrection Ship 1 and 2) and play it as-is. It's that good.</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml">Read the original post: Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/#c931</guid>


     <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:20:18
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>








    <item>


     <title>Comment from shannon</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>I KNOW!  It was awesome!  I was quite surprised at the level of emotion this episode evoked.  I definitely felt a sad relief after it was over.  A great roller coaster ride.  It could certainly be a movie!</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml">Read the original post: Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/#c932</guid>


     <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 03:07:10
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>








    <item>


     <title>Comment from mac</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Is it Friday yet? I'm going to have to break out the DVDs to curb the "Battlestar" needs I've developed.</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml">Read the original post: Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/#c940</guid>


     <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:12:50
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>








    <item>


     <title>Comment from Melinda</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>After reading what is coming up for this week, I think that "Battlestar" is going to take a page from "Lost" and utilize the flashback with more frequency (perhaps entire episodes). Tonight's episode involves Pres. Roslin flashing back to her life on Caprica (I think).</p>

<p>And if Mary McDonnell is really going to die, why is she signed on for the entire season? I keep waiting for them to find a cure for her cancer somewhere, a la Scully in "The X-Files". </p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml">Read the original post: Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/#c971</guid>


     <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:18:32
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>








    <item>


     <title>Comment from Dug</title>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>I would spell it "frak", not "frack"...  </p>

<p>1. It looks more futuristic.<br />
2. It's more like "grok".<br />
3. It's a "four-letter word".</p>

<p>I guess that would make it "frakking" though, as "fraking" sounds like yard work.  Oh, well. I stand by "frak".</p>]]><br />

         <font color="#999999"><b>Story/Commenting Options:</b></font><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml">Read the original post: Battlestar Galactica: Episode 2.12 - &quot;Resurrection Ship, Part 2&quot;</a><br /><br />
       <a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments2">Post your own comment</a><br /><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml#comments1">See all comments from this
post</a>        <br /><br />
Do nothing.
         </description>



     <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/archives/2006/01/discussion_episode_212_resurre.shtml@http://www.tvfodder.com/battlestar/#c995</guid>


     <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:59:24
-05:00</pubDate>



   </item>





 </channel>


</rss>